top of page

Your Accountability Problem Is a Leadership Problem

Writer: Jennifer Ericson
Jennifer Ericson
May 1
3 min read

Updated: 19 hours ago

Accountability is not consequences. It starts with expectations. This article explores why shared understanding matters, what it costs when it's missing, and three questions to ask before handing off any task.


So often when talking with leaders, I hear the phrase,


“I tried to hold them accountable, but I couldn’t hold their hand the whole time.”


But accountability is not consequences. It starts with expectations.


True accountability begins before there is ever a problem to address. If you want to say you hold your team accountable in a fair way, you have to do the work up front. That means being clear on deadlines, defining what “a good job” actually looks like, and ensuring there is mutual understanding.


Because saying the words is not the same as setting expectations. And assuming someone should know is not the same as confirming they do.


A shared understanding requires two-way communication. Not just telling, but verifying.


Most leaders rely on one-way communication and assume it is enough. It’s not.


The Drive-Through Test


It’s like ordering in a drive-through. The person taking your order asks you to check the screen and confirm it’s correct. Imagine if they skipped that step. You get to the window, and your order is wrong. That frustration is exactly what happens when leaders fail to confirm understanding and then react to results that don’t match their expectations.


Accountability, like leadership, does not fail in big moments. It breaks down in small ones.


A project gets assigned in a quick meeting. Everyone nods and moves on. A few days later, the work comes back off track, and frustration builds.


The leader believes the expectations were clear. The employee believes they delivered what was asked.


Without shared understanding, both can be right, and the result is still wrong.


The Real Cost of an Accountability Problem


The cost of this mistake is significant.


Financially, it shows up in wasted time, lost customers, and rework. Those are the easy costs to measure.


The bigger impact is often less visible. A lack of shared understanding erodes the employee experience and weakens culture. Over time, it increases turnover, lowers productivity, and quietly impacts your bottom line.


Leaders often skip this step because it takes time, and there are always more “pressing” tasks waiting after the meeting.


But skipping confirmation is short-sighted. An extra 10 to 15 minutes upfront can save hours of wasted time and money later.


If expectations were unclear, accountability will always feel unfair.


Three Questions Before Every Handoff


Shared understanding is simple in practice, but it requires intention and consistency.


Before handing off a task or project, ask three questions:


  • What does success look like?

  • What does done look like?

  • What could be misunderstood?


Then, instead of asking, “Do you have any questions?” shift to: “Can you walk me through how you’re going to approach this?”


That one question turns expectations into shared understanding and prevents problems before they start.


Accountability conversations should never start with consequences. They should start with clarity.


The next time accountability becomes a concern in your organization, pause. If expectations were unclear, accountability will always feel unfair. That is not an employee problem. It is a leadership gap.


Whether you lead a team here in Yuma or anywhere across the country, if you want support solving an accountability problem with clear expectations and shared understanding, I'd love to talk. Schedule a consultation.



Comments


bottom of page